Pages Navigation Menu

The Community Site for East San Carlos Residents

Caltrain Parking and SCTV

Caltrain Parking and SCTV

With the current parking lot the furthest distance to the platform from parking is between .07 and .12 miles.  These are the worst case spots, most spots are significantly closer to the platform essentially a trivial distance to walk.

With the new improved SCTV lot the closest spots will be .20 from the platform and the middle area of the parking lot i.e. Olive Street the spots will be .30 (almost a third of a mile) from the platform.  If you get there late and have to park by Arroyo then you will be .43 miles from the platform.

This was a bit surprising to me so I thought I’d measure a few more locations and their distances to the Caltrain Platform.  All distances were measured using Google Earth to the same platform location:

Distance to Caltrain Platform

.15 McCue and Bayport to Platform

.19 Springfield (4 houses down from Old County) to Platform

.20 Cherry St and Caltrain Parking Lot to Platform (closest spots in new lot)

.22 Mongomery Street and Bayport to Platfrom

.28 Transit Village Apartments North-most building to platform

.29 Town Restaurant to Platform

.32 Olive Street and Caltrain Parking Lot to platform (middle of new parking lot)

.33 City Hall to Platform

.34 Inverness (mid block) to Platform

.39 Post Office/Bianchini’s to Platform

.42 Front of Library doors to Platform

.43 Arroyo Street and Caltrain Parking Lot to Platform (furthest parking spaces in new lot)

.44 Kelly Moore Paint Store to Platform

The developer states in many of the materials available on the city site, that the number of parking spaces for Caltrain commuters will remain the same at 226.  However 47 of those 226 spaces will be “shared” with retail users.  Those 47 “shared” spots are the spots closest to the train platform, since they will be “time-limited” it is unlikely that any commuters will be able to use them!   So my above measurements from Cherry Street to the Train station platform are actually a bit too close.  Additionally this represents a 21% reduction in the total # of parking spaces relative to the current lot.

I think it’s reasonable to state that there will be a major impact to the residents of our community regarding parking given that so many of our streets are closer to the Caltrain Platform than the proposed Caltrain parking lot and the parking on our streets is free.  I also think that parking in the downtown area may get impacted as well from people driving down from the hills and looking for a closer spot than the parking lot.

I think it’s also reasonable to state that given the impending budget cuts to the city that even if we implemented a Sticker program like San Francisco that there would be no one to actually enforce it.

How much will we be charged to buy a sticker for the privilege of being able to simply park in our own neighborhood?

Wheeler Plaza seems like a much more logical choice for Transit Oriented Development than SCTV given the impact to Caltrain commuters who drive to the station and the distance of the majority of the SCTV apartments from the Caltrain Platform.

If you live in the hills and need to plan time for an additional walk of .3 to .4 miles to get to the platform after driving to the the parking lot with 20% fewer spots dedicated to commuters, this may discourage you from taking the train to work altogether adding more freeway congestion and carbon emissions.

Does this sound like transit oriented development?

Comments?

2 Comments

  1. Parking is already limited on Montgomery St. During the day my street gets so many cars parked from commuters I’m lucky to find a place to park when I get home. And forget about parking if there is a Giants or Sharks game. I would love to have a sticker program! I can only imagine how bad parking will be if they put in that Transit Village.

  2. This is a classic example of dumping a 99-year problem onto San Carlos Citizens – East and West and then leaving us to deal with the problems. What’s most infuriating about their argument is that they say it will be no problem for San Carlans to park in the new, distant Caltrain lot and walk to the train platform, yet they are unwilling for renters to walk to their apartment from parking not located directly in their building and as a result insist on 50-foot buildings towering over our homes instead of more reasonable 36 foot buildings with a few towers that won’t affect our homes.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*