Peninsula HSR Plans Unveiled
2 commentsPosted in Caltrain | 2 comments
The plans for track alignments along the Peninsula were unveiled recently, please see the article below from the San Mateo County Times/San Jose Mercury News:
Peninsula HSR Plans Unveiled
2 Responses to “Peninsula HSR Plans Unveiled”
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
City Meetings and Agendas
Subscribe to GESC
Subscribe to Comments
Issues
- Caltrain (15)
- City Council (14)
- Editorial (3)
- Featured (19)
- General Issues (24)
- GESC Meetings (10)
- GESC Positions/Letters (14)
- High Speed Rail (11)
- Holly/101 Overpass (5)
- In-N-Out (3)
- Media/Press (8)
- Neighborhood Watch (3)
- PAMF (2)
- San Carlos (4)
- San Carlos General Plan (13)
- Schools (2)
- Traffic (7)
- Transit Village (37)
- Wheeler Plaza (1)
Recent Comments
- gesc on Carlos Club Expansion – January 25th Meeting
- Ben Fuller on Zoning Changes for San Carlos
- David Rickert on In and Out Burger GESC Response
- David Rickert on In and Out Media Coverage
- Ben Fuller on In N Out Poll
- Ben Fuller on In and Out Media Coverage
- Racquel on Laureola Park Meeting – this Wednesday May 4th @ 7PM
- GESC on Interim City Council Member
San Carlos Links
High Speed Rail
Search
Admin
San Carlos News
- Burton Park Trees - Community Meetings - February 23 and 25 (News) February 3, 2012
- Free - Live Well Workshop (News) February 1, 2012
- 2012 State of the City Address & Reception - February 23rd at 5:30 pm (News) February 1, 2012
- Shoreway Environmental Center Tours - Now Available (News) January 30, 2012
- Crime Alert - Illegal Solicitors (Press Release) January 22, 2012
- NEW Construction Noise Hours (News) January 20, 2012
- Bow Wow Meow (Business Guide) January 19, 2012
- Anderson Digital (Business Guide) January 19, 2012
- Nextdoor Goes Citywide in San Carlos (News) January 17, 2012
- Nextdoor Goes Citywide in San Carlos (Press Release) January 17, 2012
San Mateo County News
- San Mateo County: Mountain lion spotted February 5, 2012
- San Mateo avoids redevelopment layoffs for now February 5, 2012
- Mitty beats Serra, takes over lead in the WCAL February 5, 2012
- Horses help injured Peninsula veterans regain direction February 4, 2012
- High school girls basketball: Palo Alto roars back to stun Wilcox 47-46 February 4, 2012
- Dogs allowed to run free in San Carlos' Burton and Highlands parks February 4, 2012
- Carolyn Livengood: Toy exhibit opening, applications accepted for government fellowship, hip-hop event planned , e-waste event benefits volunteer group, Mission Hospice, Home Care honored February 4, 2012
- Bonny Zanardi: Painting at Los Altos Library an exquisite realist piece February 4, 2012
- Caltrain riders protest bid to discontinue 8-ride discount pass February 3, 2012
- Man dubbed 'chrome revolver bandit' in Bay Area crime robbery spree faces 37 felonies February 3, 2012
San Carlos Patch
- Update: Special Ed Teacher Charged with 9 Counts of Child Abuse February 6, 2012
- SamTrans Seeking Volunteers to Take the Wheel February 6, 2012
- Businesses: Claim Your Listing on Patch for Free February 6, 2012
- They Said It! But What Do You Think?!? February 6, 2012
- Who Let The Dogs Out? February 6, 2012
- Laurel: A Case Of Identity Crisis February 6, 2012
- Nuns, TV Stars and Owl Poop February 5, 2012
- Ten Tips to Green Your Valentine's Day February 4, 2012
- Colbie Caillat, Free Tax Work, and Jazz Under the Stars Highlight the Weekend Events February 4, 2012
- Public Enemy #1...Dog Poop February 3, 2012
Caltrain & HSR
- The Bookend Approach
- Peninsula Rail Corridor Census
- The Baby Bullet Effect
- Holiday Required Reading
- ERTMS Coming To California
- Business Plan Impressions
- Blended Like Oil and Water
- Meanwhile, in Rio...
- Port Scores Pork
- Development Oriented Transit, Again
- CBOSS vs. Metrolink PTC
- Corridor Capacity Study, Free Edition
- The Truth About CBOSS
- The Root of the Problem, Visualized
- Where Four Tracks Will Be Needed
SJ Merc HSR News
- High-speed rail tapped state funds for unusual lobbying contract February 3, 2012
- Head of High-Speed Rail Authority quits as agency undergoes shake-up January 13, 2012
- Experts: Don't build $99 billion California bullet train January 4, 2012
- State high-speed rail vows to show real job figures December 23, 2011
- California high-speed rail jobs estimate too good to be true December 22, 2011
- Palo Alto adopts language formally opposing high-speed rail project December 20, 2011
- Palo Alto council to vote Monday on high-speed rail lobbyist contract December 16, 2011
Hosted by Arvixe | Powered by WordPress | Designed by Elegant Themes














Hi Clem,
Thanks for the info. I haven’t had a chance to dig into the reports yet, but have been planning a post specifically as it relates to the section in San Carlos when I get a chance to look at the documents.
I’m glad that at least the overhead is a viaduct design rather than a concrete berm which the Mercury News graphic implied. If the viaduct design is going to be 20 feet higher than the current berm, I am concerned about a 32 foot overall height. Does that height include the electrification lines or will those lines go even higher?
What is your opinion on a trench vs the viaduct design?
San Carlos certainly has the room for a trench design along the right of way property and that would align with the city of Belmont’s interests. Redwood City seems to want to go underground too.
I’m surprised that the Supplementary Alternatives Analysis Report (http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/images/chsr/20100805081646_SF-SJ%20Supplemental%20AA%20Report.pdf) isn’t generating more discussion in San Carlos.
If you look at the plans closely, our berm is going to be removed and replaced with a viaduct (unlike what is shown in the SJ Mercury News graphic). The viaduct will be 20 feet higher than the existing grade separations. Also, the station platforms may be relocated south towards Arroyo, presumably to make room for the transit village.
See profile on page 12: http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/images/chsr/20100805083343_SF%20SJ%20Supplemental%20Appendix%20B%20Plan%20and%20Profiles.pdf
In project lingo, we are located in section 4B(2).